Published by Mondaq
Click here to view article in Published website.
India: Suo Moto Extension Of Limitation Period In All Proceedings Ends On 02.10.2021 – Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of India (“SC”) vide its order dated 23.09.2021 has recalled the suo motu order of 27.04.2021, which had extended the limitation period for filing of petitions/ applications/ suits/ appeals/ all other proceedings, in view of the second wave of COVID -19 pandemic.
The SC after taking suo moto cognizance on 27.03.2020 had directed extension of the limitation period in all proceedings w.e.f. 15.03.2020, which was extended from time to time. The said order was recalled by the SC on 08.03.2021 but on taking note of the second wave was restored again on 27.04.2021.
The SC in the suo motu order dated 23.09.2021 has observed that the country is returning to normalcy and the courts/ tribunals are functioning in a hybrid manner. Therefore, the SC ended the suo moto extension of limitation period for filing of petitions/applications/suits/ appeals, etc. with the following directions:
1) The period from 15.03.2020 till 02.10.2021 shall stand excluded and the balance period of limitation remaining as on 15.03.2021, if any, will become available with effect from 03.10.2021 for any suit, appeal, application or proceeding.
2) All persons shall have a limitation period of 90 days from 03.10.2021 whose limitation has expired from 15.03.2020 till 02.10.2021. In the event the actual balance period of limitation remaining, with effect from 03.10.2021, is greater than 90 days, than longer period shall apply.
3) The period from 15.03.2020 till 02.10.2021 shall also stand excluded while computing the periods prescribed under:
(a) Sections 23 (4) and 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996;
(b) Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015;
(c) Section 138 provisos (b) and (c) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; and
(d) any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay) and termination of proceedings.
The SC further held that the Government of India (“GOI”) shall amend the guidelines for containment zones, to state “Regulated movement will be allowed for medical emergencies, provision of essential goods and services, and other necessary functions, such as, time bound applications, including for legal purposes, and educational and job-related requirements.”
https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2021/10651/10651_2021_31_301_30354_Order_23-Sep-2021.pdf
Originally published 30 September, 2021
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from India
Significant Judgments On Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 – May, 2020 To July, 2020
This compilation seeks to identify the significant developments in arbitration law by the courts of India after the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic.
10 Landmark Judgments On Arbitration By Supreme Court Of India In The Year 2019
Phoenix Legal
It also reaffirmed that the legislative intent of the Arbitration Act is party autonomy and minimal judicial interference in the arbitration process.
Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India – Their Scope, Powers And Differences
Singh & Associates
The jurisdiction of 226 and 227 is vast and has to be exercised sparingly.
The Seat v/s.Venue Debate – A Continuing Saga
The Law Point
The concepts of ‘Seat’ and ‘Venue’ are of utmost significance in any arbitration proceeding as they not only determine where the arbitration…
Appointment Of An Arbitrator: Party Autonomy vs Equity
K Law
A significant component of the arbitration process is the focus on appointment of arbitrators and the conduct of such arbitrators in the quasi-judicial proceeding, whereby the rules of the…
The Changing Phases Of Arbitration Laws In India
Legacy Law Offices