Finality fades when fraud invades: NCLT can undo resolution plan, if fraud proven

Finality fades when fraud invades NCLT can undo resolution plan, if fraud proven

Brief Overview:

Malicious and fraudulent Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) initiated under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (“I&B Code”) is liable to be set aside under Section 65 of the I&B Code, even after resolution plans have been received.

Technical Details:

Fraudulent and collusive initiation of CIRP with related party involvement is liable to be recalled under Section 65 I&B Code. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (“NCLAT”) observed and upheld the following:

  • Initiating CIRP requires establishing the existence of a debt, that it is due, and a default. At each stage, the relationship between the Petitioner and the Corporate Debtor is crucial. If the Petitioner is a related party, it raises serious doubts about the bona fides of the insolvency initiation, especially if not disclosed to the Adjudicating Authority.
  • Adjudicating Authority is fully empowered to pierce the corporate veil and examine the real intent behind the filing, and it rightly did the same.
  • Even if an application under Section 65 of the I&B Code is filed at the fag end, the same remains valid, as any fraud, once established, vitiates the entire process, including the approval of the resolution plan. The stage of the CIRP is thus immaterial when considering such an application.
Takeaways:
  • Debt & Default isn’t enough – The petitioner’s relationship with the corporate debtor is key. Related-party filings demand strict scrutiny.
  • NCLT can lift the veil – The Adjudicating Authority is empowered to pierce the corporate veil and examine real intent behind the initiation of insolvency proceedings.
  • Fraud Knows No Timeline – Section 65 of the I&B Code, allows the Adjudicating Authority to intervene at any stage of the CIRP, including post-plan approval.
  • Fraud Vitiates All – Once fraud or malicious intent is established, the entire CIRP, including resolution plan approval stands tainted and is liable to be set aside.

For further details, please see:

Expert Realty Professionals Private Limited v. Logix Infrastructure Private Limited & Ors., NCLAT.pdf

For any queries/clarifications, please feel free to ping us and we will be happy to chat
Jinal Shah, Palak Nenwani and Ronit Chopra

Similar Articles

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Explore

DISCLAIMER

The Bar Council of India prohibits advocates from soliciting work or advertising. By clicking ‘AGREE’ below, the user acknowledges that no solicitation has been made, and this website serves as a resource for general information about Juris Corp at the user’s own risk. The information provided here neither constitutes legal advice nor creates a lawyer-client relationship. The links provided are not endorsements by Juris Corp, and Juris Corp is not responsible for any linked content. Users are advised to seek independent legal advice for any legal issues.